I re-implemented my Python-based tree-walk interpreter in Go to compare performance. Without extra optimizations, this version runs about ten times faster and generates compiled binaries. Feedback is appreciated.
hey, this is super cool to see! i was wondering if you stumbled upon any quirky behavior with go’s garbage collecter? and what are your plans next for further improving concurrency? would love to hear more!
The project demonstrates a clear advantage of using a compiled language for performance-critical applications. A similar approach has proven beneficial in my work when optimizing a tool with heavy processing needs. Rewriting the interpreter in Go not only reduces the execution time significantly but also simplifies distribution with native binaries. In my experience, this shift encourages a deeper understanding of concurrency models and memory management. It also verifies the benefits of choosing languages that align with the performance requirements of the task at hand.
nice move shifting to go. imrpessive boost but curious if debugging added extra hassle? nonetheless, native binaries really ease deployemnt, and minor gc quirks are an acceptable tradeoff for speed gains. keep it up!