Supervisor recommended avoiding deletion by using an isDeleted flag. How can we deal with unique field conflicts and determine when to permanently purge outdated records?
hey, using an isdeleted flag is nice for keeping history, but u gotta mess with unique constraints. you might need to allow dupes for deleted entries and purge later. just be careful with your logic.
In my experience, using an isDeleted flag can be beneficial for retaining historical data, but it certainly introduces complexities regarding unique constraints. A strategy that worked well in one of my projects was to modify the unique indexes to ignore records marked as deleted, thereby isolating active data from legacy entries. Additionally, I found that implementing a scheduled process to permanently purge outdated records based on specific business rules not only maintained data integrity but also optimized system performance. This approach has proven effective for both auditing purposes and ensuring consistent unique field management.
hey, im curious if updating the unique key with a timestamp suffix might help avoid duplicates? have you ever tried setting an archival period for isdeleted records? would luv to hear how u tackle these gotchas in your projects.
hey, im all for the isdel flag if u can tweak your uniq logic. sometimes i add a unique id suffix to deleted records and run a periodic cleanup. its a bit messy but works fine in a pinch.
In my experience, using the isDeleted flag offers a workable compromise, but it calls for a dedicated mechanism to differentiate between current and archived data. One approach I found effective was implementing a staging strategy where deleted records are transferred to an archival table after a certain period. This separation simplifies handling unique constraints because only active records remain bound to current business rules. Additionally, this method provides clear audit trails while preserving data for historical reference, leading to easier maintenance and fewer side effects on production queries.