I would like to know the benefits and drawbacks of embedding SQL within my C# application code compared to utilizing Stored Procedures. Currently, in an open source project I’m collaborating on (C# ASP.NET Forum), we primarily generate SQL dynamically in the C# code and interact with the SQL Server database. I’m trying to determine which approach would be more effective for our specific project.
Here are some points I have considered:
Benefits of Using Code:
- Easier updates, as there’s no need to execute SQL scripts for query modifications.
- Simpler migration to different database systems since there are no Stored Procedures to transfer.
Benefits of Using Stored Procedures:
- Potentially improved performance.
- Enhanced security features.
Have you thought about how debugging is handled in both scenarios? Sometimes, having SQL in the application code can make it easier to trace and rectify errors wheras stored procs might complicate it. Also, what do you think about the maintainance effort required in the long run for either? 
From my own experience, when SQL is embedded directly within the application code, it provides more flexibility for quick iteration and testing, especially during the development phase. However, this can result in tighter coupling between your application and your database logic, which may not be conducive to scalability in larger, more complex systems. On the other hand, stored procedures can encapsulate complex logic within the database, allowing for more organized code structure and potentially faster execution times due to pre-compilation and caching mechanisms. Yet, they often increase the initial effort needed for database maintenance and change management, particularly in projects with frequent alterations or updates to the data model.