Ever inherited an embedded system with unconventional design choices? What design rules do you stick with—checksum validation, secure firmware updates, flexible parameter storage, clear code, and efficient hardware use?
i like keeping a lightweight, modular structure with robust error checkin. simple code lets us adapt easier and build in recovery without adding complexity. secure, flexible updates and low-overhead checks make a big differnce in unpredictable hardware environments.
i like a minimalistic setup with event-driven modules, focusing on robust recovry in unexpected cases. rough experiments showed that even simple adjustments could handle most errors. what have u guys found when mixing flexible configs with solid checksum verfication?
My approach has evolved over several projects, where simplicity and reliability make the difference. I rely on maintaining clear and modular code, which not only eases debugging but also ensures that future developers can extend or modify functionality without introducing new issues. I consistently apply rigorous data integrity measures through checksums and emphasize secure, reliable firmware updates. Recognizing that each hardware platform has its own limitations, I prioritize efficient resource usage while ensuring that essential flexible configurations allow the system to adapt to varying conditions.