According to reputable sources, the MVC architecture divides a system into distinct components that manage user interaction, data processing, and database communication, simplifying both development and maintenance. I’m still puzzled about how these concepts map onto the familiar ideas of frontend and backend. Specifically, is it accurate to consider the model, which handles the database logic, as the backend, and the view, responsible for displaying information to users, as the frontend?
hey guys, its interesting how the lines blur sometimes between view and controller. im surprisd by the flexibility modern frameworks offer. has anyone tried a hybrid approach that addresses these overlaps in a smarter way?
i think its oversimp to say model is backend & view is frontend. in real apps, the controller ties them together so logic gets kinda bloomed across both sides. its more integrated than just black n white
Drawing from practical experience, the mapping between front-end and back-end in the MVC pattern is rarely a direct, one-to-one relationship. While the view is primarily responsible for presenting information to the user, and the model generally handles data and business logic, the controller acts as a mediator, managing interactions and updating both as needed. In practice, modern frameworks often blur these lines to facilitate smoother interactions and maintainability, which means developers must thoughtfully design their application layers to balance clarity and flexibility.