Hello everyone,
I’m currently facing challenges in choosing an effective pattern to document my software architecture. I studied the book “Software Architecture in Practice (SEI Series in Software Engineering)” and learned about three key perspectives: Module, Allocation, and Component-and-Connector views. However, my searches online have revealed an alternative approach commonly referred to as the 4+1 views model. This discrepancy has left me uncertain about which documentation pattern would best suit my needs. I would greatly appreciate any insights or recommendations on how to proceed.
hey max, i think its all about your specific need. have u try mixin these approaches? sometimes the extra details of 4+1 helps catch things others miss. what kinda system r u buildin? would lov to hear more bout your project
hey max, have u considered starting with a simpler approach and then overlaying aspects from 4+1? might be interesting. what kind of challenges are u facing with connectors & modules? keen to hear more
hey max, maybe start with 4+1 for clarity and then mix in module aspects as needed. i found a flexible approach helps keep docs light and adapt as ur project grows. good luck!
In my experience, a successful documentation strategy often integrates multiple architectural views. While the 4+1 model offers a structured approach that clearly separates concerns, adapting its use to emphasize aspects such as allocation and component connectivity can make it more contextually relevant. I found that adjusting the focus based on stakeholder information and deployment factors can lead to a well-rounded view of the architecture. This method allows for flexibility, supporting detailed insights while preserving clarity. Careful tailoring of these perspectives ensures that the documentation remains both comprehensive and accessible.