I maintain a repository with two distinct directories: one containing the client-side code and another for the server-side logic. I’m debating whether it is better for performance and management to package both parts together in a single Docker container or to separate them into two containers with individual images. I plan to experiment with both methods and would appreciate guidance on which approach might be more effective in terms of efficiency and ease of deployment.
In my experience, separating client and server code into distinct containers offers significant advantages, particularly when it comes to individual scaling and maintenance. While a single container can simplify the initial deployment, it complicates updates and troubleshooting because both components share the same environment. By isolating each part, you can independently manage dependencies and settings, reducing the impact of any failure. Even though managing two containers can introduce slight overhead in orchestration, the benefits in modularity and operational flexibility are often worth it.
imho a combined container works well for small projects coz it keeps things simple. if you plan to scale or update parts indepdently, using seperate containers might be better in the long run.