Comparing Client-Side and Server-Side Localization Strategies

For an app using a Sails JS backend and Angular front ends, should localization be implemented server-side, client-side, or hybrid? Which approach offers the best benefits and minimal drawbacks?

i feel hybrid is best for our use-case. lets u offload some loadd to client side yet keeps server control for heavy lifting. a bit tricky at times but overall it gives smoother interection.

hey there, i lean towards a hybrid apprroach coz it mays reduce roundtrips and adapts better on the fly. have u noticd any perf hit with either method? would love to hear how ur project handles these nuances.

Based on my experience with large-scale applications, I recommend focusing primarily on server-side localization while carefully employing caching or limited client-side processing for dynamic elements. This approach ensures that translations remain consistent and easily managed across different environments. Server-side implementation provides better control over content updates and maintains synchronization with backend data, enhancing overall reliability. The selective use of client-side adjustments can improve responsiveness without sacrificing the centralized management advantages that come with server-side processing. This balance often simplifies maintenance and helps manage performance in a scalable and efficient manner.