Comparing three inventory tables returns NULLs that disrupt calculations. COALESCE failed. Example SQL below uses different table and column names to resolve missing values.
SELECT PN.part_id,
PN.required_qty - (COALESCE(DI.adjusted_qty * 2, 0) + COALESCE(BI.purchased_qty, 0)) AS remaining
FROM PartsNeeded PN
LEFT JOIN DoubleInventory DI ON PN.part_id = DI.part_id
JOIN BoughtInventory BI ON PN.part_id = BI.part_id
WHERE remaining > 0;
hey, i faced similar probems and ended up wrapping tables in subqueries that filled nulls. turning joins into nested queries fixed mis-match issues. it wasnt perfect but got my calc right. hope this helps u figure it out!
I have encountered similar issues where NULL values interfere with calculations during SQL joins. In one project, I took a methodical approach by first isolating each join to understand which table was contributing NULLs. I then improved overall accuracy by adjusting join conditions and experimenting with full outer joins to cover all potential matches. Additionally, I used CASE statements to trace how intermediate values were calculated before applying the final arithmetic. This approach allowed me to pinpoint the origin of the NULLs and address them effectively, ensuring reliable inventory comparisons.
hey, ive been tinkering with similar sql issues. have you tried rearranging join order or using a subquery that filters out nulls first? sometimes datatype mismatches creep in too. what approach did u eventually settle on?
hey, ive been triying a derived table approach to filter nulls first. has anyone else explored reordering joins to fix unwanted nulls? how do u handle datatype quirks on similar cases? would love to hear ur experiance!