What are the key differences and similarities between Prolog and SQL?

I’m currently studying Prolog and I’m curious about how it compares to SQL from a theoretical perspective.

I’ve noticed some similarities between these two languages:

  • Both use declarative programming approaches
  • Both work with knowledge bases containing facts
  • Both allow querying data using question-like syntax
  • Both handle functional relationships between data

I’m wondering if there are other shared characteristics I might have missed. Also, what are the main differences that set these languages apart? I’d appreciate any insights from people who have experience with both languages.

Thanks in advance for your help!

The main difference? They solve problems completely differently. SQL works with structured database tables - you write queries and get back data sets. Prolog is all about logic programming where you set up rules and facts, then let it figure out solutions through logical reasoning. SQL’s great for pulling and manipulating database info. Prolog excels at AI tasks, expert systems, and complex rule-based problems. Sure, they both use declarative syntax, but that’s where the similarity ends. SQL gives you data results, while Prolog can generate multiple solutions by exploring different logical paths. Once you grasp this core difference, it’s easier to choose the right tool for your project.

that’s a super intriguing point! it’s cool how prolog grabs recursion way easier than sql does, which can be a bit clunky with ctes. was there a specific project that got ya thinkin about these languages together?

yeah, true! sql needs schemas first, which can feel restrictive, while prolog’s all about flexibility. backtracking is def a game changer too, makes prolog super powerful for certain queries. have u tried practical examples yet?