GCP Load Balancers: What are the primary differences among TCP (target pools), HTTP(S) (backend services), and internal (regional backend services) configurations in Google Cloud?
i think target pools are your basic tcp option, while backend services bring more refined routing for web traffic, and regional ones are built for internal use with lower latency. all come down to balancing simplicity and advanced features for your workload.
i think tcp target pools are basic routing with simple health cheks, backend services add http layer and caching, and regional ones are meant for internal traffic within specific zones; each is tailored for different load balancing needs.
hey, reading this got me thinking: arent target pools best for simple tcp routing? i feel backend services offer neat details in health and routing, while regional ones seem more about internal traffic. what do u guys think about their flexability?
hey ppl, i belive target pools offer simple tcp routng, while backend services give u robust http cheks and better route control. regional ones cater to internal needs, reducing latency. what challenges did u face while using these in your projects?
Based on hands-on experience with different GCP configurations, selecting between target pools, backend services, and regional backend services involves evaluating specific project requirements for networking and load distribution. Target pools are typically employed for basic TCP load balancing where detailed health checks are not a primary concern. Backend services, typically used for HTTP(S) traffic, provide improved health check mechanisms and more flexible routing options, making them suitable for external client-facing workloads. Meanwhile, regional backend services are optimized for internal communications within a region, offering fine-grained control over service endpoints and reducing cross-region traffic latency.