Do major enterprises fully plan their software architecture before coding, or do they iterate design and feature additions? I seek guidance on effective, patient development strategies.
i reckon many firms start with a basic, flexable outline and then tweak as they go. it might seem a bit messy, but quick fixes based on real-time feedback often save the day in develpment.
Major enterprises typically employ a hybrid approach that combines substantial initial planning with iterative development processes. In my experience, they establish a robust architectural foundation to ensure scalability and maintainability, yet this blueprint is not set in stone. Instead, enterprises often use agile methodologies to adapt to changing requirements and unforeseen challenges. This approach allows for continuous refinement through feedback loops and performance assessments, ensuring that the software evolves effectively while adhering to strategic objectives and industry standards.
hey, i think most big firms kick off with a rough bluepint and refine as they go. its interesting how they balance planning with iterative tweaks. ever come across a case where an unexpected change turned out to be a lifesaver?