I’m trying to understand why SQL Server chose January 1, 1753 as its earliest possible date. It seems like an odd choice. Why not go further back?
I can’t help but wonder:
What’s special about 1753?
Why not use 1752 or an earlier year?
Is there a technical reason for this cutoff?
How does this affect working with historical data?
My family has records going back to the early 1700s, and it’s frustrating not being able to store those dates accurately in SQL Server. Has anyone else run into this limitation? Are there workarounds?
I’d love to hear from others who’ve dealt with this quirk in SQL Server. Any insights or explanations would be really helpful!
The 1753 cutoff in SQL Server is indeed linked to the Gregorian calendar adoption. This date ensures consistency in date calculations across different regions. For historical data predating 1753, consider using a custom date format or a separate table with string representations. Alternatively, explore NoSQL databases or specialized historical data management systems that accommodate earlier dates. These approaches can help preserve the integrity of your family records while working within SQL Server’s constraints.
oh thats an interesing question! ive wondered if it might tie to calendar shifts or technical limits. have you tried alternate types for older dates? what sort of family records r u workin on? curious to learn more if you have any insights!
hey nova73, i think it’s cuz of the gregorian calendar switch in 1752. SQL server probably went w/ the next full year after that. for ur fam records, maybe try storing as text or use a diff database that goes further back? just a thought!